[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.And that would be greatbut of no real value to C/S except pc has had a win and not to now use husband .Give you an actual example: Pc in Solo ruds found she hated George.It F/Ned.Next audited session pc was saying she hated George.Wrote a note about George.C/Sdid not notice the outness.Ordered LIB on George and in a 2-way comm got little or noTA, continued to be ill.The fact is it wasn t George at all and not even a terminal.Pchad gone up one grade too many, hit an overwhelm, the earlier 6 grades were out!Correct action was to have done a general repair the moment a pc suddenly andmysteriously caved in and got ill on a new level! The pc never should have been goingon up grades for the last 6 grades!The tendency to toss it all off with a Q and A not only didn t handle but obscuredthe real situation.32 C/Sing A WINThe second Q and A is to C/S a pc win.Pc in 2-way comm mentions cats and more cats and cats and finally at the end ofsession has a big F/N Cog VGIs on cats.The C/S sees all this cat mention and orders Prepcheck cats. That is a very cruel sort of Q and A.Another version of it of course is to see a pc reach a full End Phenomena on aseries of processes like an unmistakable pc-volunteered valence shift and keep on goinginto an inval.Correction is to rehab of course.Yet another version is to pull a w/h and then keep pulling it so the pc doesn tthink it s gone.Correction is to rehab of course.The TA often goes high or low on these Q and A actions and Inval-Eval actionsare ordered and the release point rehabbed.NEXT GRADE PLEASE!The third Q and A a C/S can pull is to agree to the pc s demands for the nextgrade despite all contrary indicators. I m ready for Clear now! says the pc full of somatics whose R6EW wasn treally done and who can t talk.The Registrar, execs and others push on this also.The D of P and C/S have total authority on this.They should be diplomatic. Hecan have the grade of course but I will have to prepare him for it, is the best answer. Please make arrangements for Clear preparation 25 hours. If the C/S doesn t hold the fort on this the pc put into the next grade who isn tready will fall on his head.If this pressure from the pc (in any version) continues, have him sign a waiver Iwill not hold the org or any principals responsible and waive any refund if I am put onnext grade. That either gets home or he says okay and signs.So put him on the gradeand hope he doesn t fall on his head and if he does, now demand he get the hoursneeded to get fixed up so he can really make it.A D of P or C/S often have other pressures exerted on them that are not technicalin nature such as economics, ambition, status symbols (of having a high graderegardless of a headache) and have to cope with these diplomatically.But any but techconsiderations are dangerous to entertain.SUMMATIONOf these 3, 2 are concerned with letting someone else C/S.Like an engineerletting someone else plan the railroad.And the third is also slightly in that nature, consisting of not noticing the pc swins and using them with which to C/S.CAUTIONThis doesn t mean the pc is always wrong.He is generally right when he sayshe s overwhelmed or upset.He s almost always wrong when he says what33 overwhelmed him or what BPC was out WHEN SIMPLY SAYING IT DOES NOTCORRECT THE CASE OR PRODUCE F/N VGIs.You always use the pc s data one way or another in that you are paralleling whatthe MIND does.That s reads.Not what the pc says.Remember that what s really wrong lies in the field of mass, energy, space, time,form and location.As these are eased up (by Standard Dianetics and 18 years ofScientology actions and processes) thoughts come to view.So if you Q and A withthoughts already in full view, you never really ease up the bank.That s why Q and Awith significance is not done.L.RON HUBBARDFounderLRH:nt.rdCopyright © 1970by L.Ron HubbardALL RIGHTS RESERVED34 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICESaint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, SussexHCO BULLETIN OF 19 JUNE 1970Issue IIRemimeoC/S Series 8CHART OF HUMAN EVALUATIONScience of Survival s Chart of Human Evaluation is a study for C/Ses and is ofgreat use.When you find the pc on one of its columns you can see if the pc stays there orfalls back there.Standard Dianetics opened this chart to full use for C/Ses.18 years ofScientology processes and know-how are to a large degree evolved from this chart.IF A PC IS STAYING AT A LEVEL OF THE CHART OR FALLS ON IT youknow he is running above his level.Processing Changes Conditions.If it doesn t improve them (or the pc s behavior) then the pc s Reality is not beingreached.It can be plus or minus, above or below.It is seldom that the pc s reality ishigher than the processes used and really only occurs when a grade honestly run isrerun.Then you get pc protest as he s made that.Pcs who get sick suddenly are being run far too high on the Class Chart.Pcs whodon t change are also being run too high.Behavior, mannerisms are the index.DO THESE CHANGE? If they do the pc isimproving.If they drop lower on the Human Evaluation Chart the pc is in overwhelm.PICKING THOUGHTS OUT OF FORCES IN THE BANK BRINGS A NOCHANGE.In other words you can park a pc by continuing nothing but think processeswhich address only significance.SELF AUDITINGSelf auditing is the manifestation of being overwhelmed by masses etc and pullingonly think out of the bank.Pulling out think then pulls in more force which gives moreself audit.Not all self audit is bad.The pc eventually realizes it s forces! After a few tens ofthousands of hours! If he knows all the answers.A good push against a wall is worth a hundred hours of self auditing.And it sforce.HUMAN EVALUATIONThis famous chart (in use by the way by an airline and several other areas, andwhich had to be printed as desk blotters for personnel people at one time) could easilybe expanded in numbers of vertical columns to include all behavior.35 The C/S is at a disadvantage as he doesn t see pcs.But he can have a mannerismitem filled in on a Summary Report. Mannerisms______ Mannerism changes_____ This serves.It also serves to look at the psychosomatic column of the chart and a pc s HealthForm.CHANGING THE PCThe pc will change in ideas when he changes his relationship to forces.Tons of processes do this.Objective Processes have to be run in on a pc now and then.Somatics passing through in a session are a definite clue to force change.The no-somatic pc is either high as an angel or being run too high.You don t have to run directly at force for forces to change in the pc.One 2 way comm I did with a pc released his hold on a huge bundle of forces!The body responds badly to forces.The conflict between protecting or using a body and being as a thetan able towithstand large forces gets so mixed up in a pc he can wind up as a force-shy thetan !STANDARD PROCESSESStandard processes such as those in use for 18 years handle this when fitted intotheir levels.What the C/S has to realize is that he is (a) producing an optimum rate of changein the pc if he is C/Sing well and (b) changing the pc s position upward on the Chart ofHuman Evaluation.L.RON HUBBARDFounderLRH:nt.rdCopyright © 1970by L [ Pobierz caÅ‚ość w formacie PDF ]
zanotowane.pl doc.pisz.pl pdf.pisz.pl trzylatki.xlx.pl
.And that would be greatbut of no real value to C/S except pc has had a win and not to now use husband .Give you an actual example: Pc in Solo ruds found she hated George.It F/Ned.Next audited session pc was saying she hated George.Wrote a note about George.C/Sdid not notice the outness.Ordered LIB on George and in a 2-way comm got little or noTA, continued to be ill.The fact is it wasn t George at all and not even a terminal.Pchad gone up one grade too many, hit an overwhelm, the earlier 6 grades were out!Correct action was to have done a general repair the moment a pc suddenly andmysteriously caved in and got ill on a new level! The pc never should have been goingon up grades for the last 6 grades!The tendency to toss it all off with a Q and A not only didn t handle but obscuredthe real situation.32 C/Sing A WINThe second Q and A is to C/S a pc win.Pc in 2-way comm mentions cats and more cats and cats and finally at the end ofsession has a big F/N Cog VGIs on cats.The C/S sees all this cat mention and orders Prepcheck cats. That is a very cruel sort of Q and A.Another version of it of course is to see a pc reach a full End Phenomena on aseries of processes like an unmistakable pc-volunteered valence shift and keep on goinginto an inval.Correction is to rehab of course.Yet another version is to pull a w/h and then keep pulling it so the pc doesn tthink it s gone.Correction is to rehab of course.The TA often goes high or low on these Q and A actions and Inval-Eval actionsare ordered and the release point rehabbed.NEXT GRADE PLEASE!The third Q and A a C/S can pull is to agree to the pc s demands for the nextgrade despite all contrary indicators. I m ready for Clear now! says the pc full of somatics whose R6EW wasn treally done and who can t talk.The Registrar, execs and others push on this also.The D of P and C/S have total authority on this.They should be diplomatic. Hecan have the grade of course but I will have to prepare him for it, is the best answer. Please make arrangements for Clear preparation 25 hours. If the C/S doesn t hold the fort on this the pc put into the next grade who isn tready will fall on his head.If this pressure from the pc (in any version) continues, have him sign a waiver Iwill not hold the org or any principals responsible and waive any refund if I am put onnext grade. That either gets home or he says okay and signs.So put him on the gradeand hope he doesn t fall on his head and if he does, now demand he get the hoursneeded to get fixed up so he can really make it.A D of P or C/S often have other pressures exerted on them that are not technicalin nature such as economics, ambition, status symbols (of having a high graderegardless of a headache) and have to cope with these diplomatically.But any but techconsiderations are dangerous to entertain.SUMMATIONOf these 3, 2 are concerned with letting someone else C/S.Like an engineerletting someone else plan the railroad.And the third is also slightly in that nature, consisting of not noticing the pc swins and using them with which to C/S.CAUTIONThis doesn t mean the pc is always wrong.He is generally right when he sayshe s overwhelmed or upset.He s almost always wrong when he says what33 overwhelmed him or what BPC was out WHEN SIMPLY SAYING IT DOES NOTCORRECT THE CASE OR PRODUCE F/N VGIs.You always use the pc s data one way or another in that you are paralleling whatthe MIND does.That s reads.Not what the pc says.Remember that what s really wrong lies in the field of mass, energy, space, time,form and location.As these are eased up (by Standard Dianetics and 18 years ofScientology actions and processes) thoughts come to view.So if you Q and A withthoughts already in full view, you never really ease up the bank.That s why Q and Awith significance is not done.L.RON HUBBARDFounderLRH:nt.rdCopyright © 1970by L.Ron HubbardALL RIGHTS RESERVED34 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICESaint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, SussexHCO BULLETIN OF 19 JUNE 1970Issue IIRemimeoC/S Series 8CHART OF HUMAN EVALUATIONScience of Survival s Chart of Human Evaluation is a study for C/Ses and is ofgreat use.When you find the pc on one of its columns you can see if the pc stays there orfalls back there.Standard Dianetics opened this chart to full use for C/Ses.18 years ofScientology processes and know-how are to a large degree evolved from this chart.IF A PC IS STAYING AT A LEVEL OF THE CHART OR FALLS ON IT youknow he is running above his level.Processing Changes Conditions.If it doesn t improve them (or the pc s behavior) then the pc s Reality is not beingreached.It can be plus or minus, above or below.It is seldom that the pc s reality ishigher than the processes used and really only occurs when a grade honestly run isrerun.Then you get pc protest as he s made that.Pcs who get sick suddenly are being run far too high on the Class Chart.Pcs whodon t change are also being run too high.Behavior, mannerisms are the index.DO THESE CHANGE? If they do the pc isimproving.If they drop lower on the Human Evaluation Chart the pc is in overwhelm.PICKING THOUGHTS OUT OF FORCES IN THE BANK BRINGS A NOCHANGE.In other words you can park a pc by continuing nothing but think processeswhich address only significance.SELF AUDITINGSelf auditing is the manifestation of being overwhelmed by masses etc and pullingonly think out of the bank.Pulling out think then pulls in more force which gives moreself audit.Not all self audit is bad.The pc eventually realizes it s forces! After a few tens ofthousands of hours! If he knows all the answers.A good push against a wall is worth a hundred hours of self auditing.And it sforce.HUMAN EVALUATIONThis famous chart (in use by the way by an airline and several other areas, andwhich had to be printed as desk blotters for personnel people at one time) could easilybe expanded in numbers of vertical columns to include all behavior.35 The C/S is at a disadvantage as he doesn t see pcs.But he can have a mannerismitem filled in on a Summary Report. Mannerisms______ Mannerism changes_____ This serves.It also serves to look at the psychosomatic column of the chart and a pc s HealthForm.CHANGING THE PCThe pc will change in ideas when he changes his relationship to forces.Tons of processes do this.Objective Processes have to be run in on a pc now and then.Somatics passing through in a session are a definite clue to force change.The no-somatic pc is either high as an angel or being run too high.You don t have to run directly at force for forces to change in the pc.One 2 way comm I did with a pc released his hold on a huge bundle of forces!The body responds badly to forces.The conflict between protecting or using a body and being as a thetan able towithstand large forces gets so mixed up in a pc he can wind up as a force-shy thetan !STANDARD PROCESSESStandard processes such as those in use for 18 years handle this when fitted intotheir levels.What the C/S has to realize is that he is (a) producing an optimum rate of changein the pc if he is C/Sing well and (b) changing the pc s position upward on the Chart ofHuman Evaluation.L.RON HUBBARDFounderLRH:nt.rdCopyright © 1970by L [ Pobierz caÅ‚ość w formacie PDF ]